Skip to main content

Understanding models behind AiVA AI agents

Learn which AI models power DialLink's voice and messaging agents, and how to choose the right one for your use case and budget.

Models for AI voice agents

DialLink's AI voice agent uses advanced real-time speech-to-speech AI models to process audio input, generate responses, and deliver them back in natural-sounding speech. These models are optimized for low-latency communication, helping conversations feel smooth and responsive for callers.

Difference between AI agent models

Feature

Open AI Realtime

Open AI Realtime Mini

Grok Fast

Grok Think Fast

Response quality

More natural, nuanced, and context-aware

Clear but more straightforward responses

Good at working through multi-step tasks like handling a support request or a finance question from start to finish

Reasons through queries while speaking; trained for natural, human-like conversational patterns

Understanding accuracy

Higher, handles ambiguity and multi-step requests

Good, best for predictable, structured queries

Very accurate at real-world customer support tasks that involve using tools (like looking up an account or updating a booking)

High accuracy on speech reasoning and agentic voice benchmarks, even in noisy or telephony conditions

Latency (response speed)

Low

Very low (faster responses)

Very low

Very low (sub-one-second time to first audio)

Scalability

Suitable for moderate call volumes

Ideal for large-scale call handling

Can hold very long conversations without losing track of earlier details, good for complex, high-volume tasks

Suitable for high-volume, complex conversational workloads

Performance

Higher quality with more advanced reasoning

Optimized for simple, direct interactions

Makes far fewer factual mistakes than its predecessor, and offers two modes: one for deeper thinking, one for instant replies

Strong agentic performance, handles multi-step tool use and tasks while talking

How to choose AI voice agent model

Each model is designed for different types of interactions.

OpenAI Realtime Mini is best for simple, high-volume scenarios. It's also more consistent and follows scripted rules and guardrails more closely, which makes it a strong fit for structured, first-line interactions such as:

  • First-line call handling

  • Call routing

  • Basic FAQs

  • Data collection

  • Appointment scheduling

Open AI Realtime is best for more complex, high-value conversations, such as:

  • Customer support with nuanced requests

  • Sales calls

  • Detailed inquiries

  • Complex or multi-step FAQs

Grok Think Fast is best for high-volume conversations that still require strong reasoning, such as:

  • Complex customer support at scale

  • Multi-step tool use during a call (looking up information, taking actions, and continuing the conversation without added delay)

  • Conversations requiring high accuracy in noisy environments or over the phone line

  • Workflows where fast response time and advanced reasoning are both required

Models for AI messaging agents

Text-enabled agents can be powered by the following models: GPT-5, GPT-5 Mini, GPT-5 Nano, Haiku 4.5, and Sonnet 4.5.

Differences between text agent models

Feature

GPT-5

GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Nano

Haiku 4.5

Sonnet 4.5

Response quality

Strong, nuanced responses for complex reasoning and agentic tasks

Clear, well-defined responses; less nuanced than GPT-5

Simple, direct responses; limited reasoning depth

Near-frontier quality despite its small size and speed

High-quality reasoning with strong coding and agentic performance

Understanding accuracy

High, handles ambiguity and multi-step requests well

Good, best for precise prompts and well-defined tasks

Lower reasoning depth, best for narrow tasks

High accuracy across reasoning, coding, and tool-use tasks

Highest accuracy in this set, strong on nuanced, multi-step requests

Latency (response speed)

Moderate

Fast

Very fast

Very fast

Moderate

Scalability

Suitable for moderate-volume, higher-value conversations

Good for high-volume, well-defined interactions

Ideal for very high-volume, simple tasks (e.g., classification)

Ideal for high-volume, real-time interactions

Suitable for moderate volumes where quality matters most

Performance

Strong all-around reasoning and agentic performance

Balanced performance for lighter-weight reasoning tasks

Optimized for speed over depth; best for summarization and classification

Matches previous-generation Sonnet performance at a fraction of the cost and latency

Top-tier performance for coding, reasoning, and complex agent workflows

How to choose an AI messaging agent model

Each model is designed for different types of interactions.

GPT-5 Nano is best for simple, high-volume tasks, such as:

  • Basic FAQ responses

  • Message classification and routing

  • Short, routine replies

GPT-5 Mini is best for well-defined, moderate-volume interactions, such as:

  • Structured customer inquiries

  • Order or appointment status updates

  • Routine multi-step requests with predictable patterns

GPT-5 is best for more complex, higher-value conversations, such as:

  • Nuanced customer support requests

  • Multi-step troubleshooting over text

  • Detailed inquiries requiring broader context

Haiku 4.5 is best for fast, high-volume conversations that still need strong quality, such as:

  • Real-time messaging at scale

  • Customer support that requires quick, accurate responses

  • High-volume tasks that benefit from tool use (e.g., looking up order details)

Sonnet 4.5 is best for complex, high-value conversations where accuracy matters most, such as:

  • Detailed technical or account-specific questions

  • Multi-step conversations involving tools or integrations

  • Conversations where getting the answer right outweighs response speed

Did this answer your question?